I have been moved to a new cell - which I share.  I shall tell you something about this particular individual - later.  I do not want to be sidetracked from my initial purpose.  

​

This sharing of a cell with another, followed what I believe to be injections?  Or pills? - administered to me - without my knowledge, or things put in my food? - drink...?  Something was playing with my mind!!!

​

This has not weakened my resolve though - far from it - I am still alive - in good health, cheerful - since in both 'Time Lines' I am aware of - "I survive to tell the tale!!!" 

​

But that's the thing about 'Life' - if I can call what I am now experiencing, 'Life!?' -

 

But it must be 'Life?' - for what else could it be? 

 

I am not 'dead'? -

 

"I think therefore I am" - it was once most famously said (click here) - but there's something else isn't there - 'something even deeper' -

​

'I feel -

Therefore 

I EXIST!'

​

Now where are those scraps of paper - just get this down - Yes - 'I feel - therefore I EXIST.'

​

Prisoner's Commentary & Notes - for further consideration -

​

Is "I AM," equivalent to EXISTENCE? - if not, which is the 'anterior' - element? - or which precedes the other?

 

Which is the 'greater set?' - qualitatively - 'in that it precedes the other within 'ABSOLUTE CONSCIOUSNESS'?' - To 'THINK' or to 'FEEL'? - Yes - I believe - 'I feel - therefore I EXIST' is the more fundamental!!! -

 

'I feel - therefore I Exist' - (man - that's serious.)

​

'I FEEL - therefore I EXIST' - also does not suffer from the 'Dualism of Mind' - which has plagued Western Philosophical thought - since those fatal words - "I think therefore I am," were penned - and split the 'Western psyche,' in such a fundamental way - it has still not truly recovered!!!

 

For what is to 'feel' - than to include the entirety - of what it is to be a 'Human Existence?' -

An 'Individual Consciousness?' -

Thus! - to 'Feel' - outflanks! - to 'Think'! - it is the 'greater set!!!' 

 

But what of the objection that you cannot 'feel' - without thinking - so what comes first - to think or to feel? - can you feel without thinking? 

​

You can think without feeling - for to think, does not imply to feel.

 

Therefore to 'feel' is not necessarily included in the process to 'think.'

​

Whilst not 'mutually exclusive elements,' they can be regarded as 'separate elements.' 

 

To 'feel' however - do I have to 'think?' -

to that, the answer is no. 

For there are certain 'human actions,' which one could style as 'involuntary actions.'

 

And there are other 'actions,' that one could call 'intuitive actions' - and when these occur, a person can be said to 'have acted without thought,' for 'thought' is not necessary.

​

'Thinking' like 'walking' or 'talking' - is a 'mode of expression.'  To 'feel' -is not a 'mode of expression' - IT IS THE EXPRESSION ITSELF! - un-moded / without mode, - it is - BEING! - EXISTENCE!

​

Therefore one can 'feel' - without 'thinking.'  Therefore to 'feel' is more 'fundamental' than to 'think.' 

 

Therefore -

I 'FEEL'

Therefore I 'EXIST'

​

Is the more 'fundamental statement.'  

 

(Now - I just need some more paper - and I will scribble it out - in my usual code and get it out of my.................... - send with - next delivery - items to include - DOPES (3) and ZYAPON-NIMA CONSPIRACY..... - )

​

..."No I don't have a cigarette... anyway you know I don't smoke - smoking is not permitted in cells - if you wanna smoke you're gonna have to go outside... yes 

That's right - you and whose army?

Me dead?!  You're dead!

I don't care who you know!" ....................